as a continuation to my the male – beauty! yes! series…
my second presentation…
the male form is indeed one of the most confusing when it comes to appreciation. at the first look the nude male form is surely erotic, but on further appreciation one comes across the intricacies of the male body form.
from the beautifully designed torso (previously discussed), to the even more interesting (ahem!) mid-hip (loin) area, to well, the legs. a well defined man’s body (if well maintained) is quite a pleasure to any discerning eye.
i am trying to help re – establish the ‘innocent’ beauty of the male form, from a pure sense of aestheticism, beyond the more ‘forced’ carnal attitude towards it.
the male form deserves its recognition as equally aesthetic, or well the romans, greeks, and chinese might have all been wrong…
ponder on…
my second presentation…
the male form is indeed one of the most confusing when it comes to appreciation. at the first look the nude male form is surely erotic, but on further appreciation one comes across the intricacies of the male body form.
from the beautifully designed torso (previously discussed), to the even more interesting (ahem!) mid-hip (loin) area, to well, the legs. a well defined man’s body (if well maintained) is quite a pleasure to any discerning eye.
i am trying to help re – establish the ‘innocent’ beauty of the male form, from a pure sense of aestheticism, beyond the more ‘forced’ carnal attitude towards it.
the male form deserves its recognition as equally aesthetic, or well the romans, greeks, and chinese might have all been wrong…
ponder on…
thanks@dylan rosserthe model=ivan (a fav of dylan rosser)
the artist is known worldwide for his 'the male form' project, a project that has also created many other similar projects including the infamous 'penis project' that has tried to establish male sexuality as an equally aesthete form in normal societal definitions.